Exam PMP topic 1 question 556 discussion

I think the answer is A. This question is talking about the unclarity of the requirement. So the best option is to clarify the requirement with stake holders. If you go with answer D, again rework may be expected on the prototype until the requirement is clear and all are on the same page.

The question mentions PM has observed this issue in "progress reviews". So, it has happened multiple times. If the scenario involves delays due to different interpretations of client needs during progress reviews, then the need for a consistent practice like preparing prototypes becomes even more important.

When delays are caused by different interpretations of client requirements, the best approach is to use prototypes to: Visualize requirements clearly Align understanding between the client, project team, and development team Reduce the likelihood of further miscommunication and rework Prototyping is a powerful tool in software development, especially in cross-cultural or remote teams, where verbal or written descriptions may lead to different interpretations. It allows for early validation and helps ensure everyone is building the right product.

setting up meeting is fine but might not be good enough

Reference: PMBOK Guide – Scope Management (Validate Scope, Requirements Management Plan, and Prototyping in Agile/Hybrid Projects) Prototyping is a technique used in Collect Requirements and Validate Scope processes (PMBOK Guide, Chapter 5 – Scope Management). It helps reduce ambiguity, align expectations, and ensure that all teams, especially distributed ones, have a common understanding of the requirements. Since the delays are due to misinterpretations, using prototypes allows the team to visually confirm requirements and reduce rework.

I will also go with A as D is more Faster delivery to gain customer feedback thing and QA focus often, and the question imply the unalignment on the requirements

Option A is correct. It is more efficient to discuss client's needs and clarify the requirements with the stakeholders (project team, development team and client). A. Set up a meeting with key stakeholders to clarify requirements.

Option A is correct. It is more efficient to discuss client's needs and clarify the requirements with the stakeholders (project team, development team and client). A. Set up a meeting with key stakeholders to clarify requirements.

A Even for a prototype, clarity on requirements comes first and consultation / meetings with key stakeholders is required.

This problem is not interpreted as a problem with stakeholders, but rather as a lack of understanding among team members due to physical distance. This needs to be resolved by creating a prototype among team members.

While A would help clarify requirements, it relies on verbal or written communication, which can still be misinterpreted, especially in cross-cultural or remote teams. D addresses the root cause more effectively by providing a shared, visual understanding of what needs to be developed.

A is correct answer

since customer knows what he wants, why create prototype? I think A is correct

Option D takes a more practical and visual approach that directly demonstrates the software functionalities, potentially aiding in faster alignment and reducing the chances of misinterpretation or rework.

'identified completion date delays due to rework because there were different interpretations of the client's needs' highlight delay and interpretations are clarified and so, rework is decided/ongoing. In that case, what clarification is needed with customer. There is only one impact which is delay in schedule and only option here is to escalate.

rework menaing thye already have examples and still disagree so go to the source for clarification with all involved.

Prototypes is the correct tool to clarify well the requirements.