Exam PMP topic 1 question 471 discussion

I would choose B, it seems that the SPI has been increased dramatically to a point it is almost 2x at 1.8, this happens because it does seems that $ is spent to increase velocity making CPI to hit 0.1. The PM should stop accelerating the time and end up paying for more resource to speed through the project

C. Manage the project sponsor closely and revise the project's resource management plan to improve indicators. This option suggests actively managing the relationship with the project sponsor and taking steps to address the performance indicators. Revising the resource management plan could involve re-evaluating resource allocation, identifying and addressing resource constraints, and making necessary adjustments to improve both the schedule performance index (SPI) and cost performance index (CPI). Options A and B do not directly address the concerns or provide proactive steps to improve the project's performance. Option D, using a resource-leveling technique, may be part of the solution, but it is not the comprehensive approach suggested by option C.

I would choose B, even with a different expert opinion, it is B

there's no indication here that crashing is being used

C. Manage the project sponsor closely and revise the project's resource management plan to improve indicators

the best approach might involve a combination of strategies, including re-evaluating the project's resource management plan, monitoring and managing costs, optimizing schedule adjustments, and communicating closely with the project sponsor to ensure alignment with project objectives and constraints.

B 1.Since the SPI is 1.8, it indicates that the project is ahead of schedule. Therefore, crashing the schedule by adding more resources or compressing the timeline may not be necessary or beneficial. 2.However, the CPI of 0.1 suggests that the project is experiencing significant cost overruns. This is a cause for concern and requires attention. 3.Stopping the crashing of the schedule means refraining from further accelerating the project timeline, as the project is already ahead of schedule. This action can help avoid unnecessary additional costs associated with rushing the project.

Option B, "Stop crashing the schedule," is not the best course of action because it does not address the underlying issues that are causing the poor SPI and CPI. Crashing the schedule may temporarily improve the schedule performance index, but it will likely lead to increased costs and decreased quality. The project manager should instead focus on managing the project sponsor closely and revising the project's resource management plan to improve the indicators. This will help to ensure that the project is delivered on time and within budget, while also meeting the project sponsor's expectations.

I think the answer is C. Considering B as the answer implies that the project manager is "crashing the schedule." However, as we know, the SPI and CPI values are not as expected suggests that there may be reasons or circumstances that the project manager did not plan or anticipate. (At the very least, the states in the question that the "project manager notices," and there is no indication that the project manager desires specific SPI and CPI values. However, it is evident that the project manager has not managed this aspect properly.) Furthermore, given that "the project sponsor" is concerned about the issue in the question, it indicates the need to manage "the project sponsor" effectively. As we all know, when "the project sponsor" does not view the project manager favorably, it can make the project even more challenging. For these reasons, I believe that option C is more suitable as a solution to the issue raised in the problem.

I'll go with B.

The PM is adding more resources to speed up time ,thus we have poor CPI with an over bloated schedule,so he should stop crashing schedule to redeem cost.B is correct

I think B is correct

shouldn't the answer be C?