Exam PMP topic 1 question 186 discussion

A is the better option because of team empowerment, flexibility, specific rewards for individuals, and it will improve spirits. B is okay, but some people might not want to do a team lunch after working overtime with each other for so long.

B is the answer, note there was misunderstanding among team members, therefore Team building sessions is needed.

I changed the anwer to B. The situation is in the "Develop team" process. The techniques for this situation are team building or conflict management. The best anwser is B.

The project sponsor has allocated a monetary award. How should the project manager "utilize" the award? Option A is better. Meet with the team members and ask them how to spend the reward. Option B. semms the project manager decides the award should be used to arange a luncheon for all team members and include team-building sessions.

The point here is "misunderstandings". The project manager needs to bring the team members together to alleviate the gap. It could be a luncheon, teambuilding activity, or whatever. Let me ask you. Can the project manager clear up their misunderstandings by "asking them how to spend the reward."?

A is a better answer, C is possible too, cant be B. Luncheons and team building activities are done for engagement NOT for working overtime, also, we need to understand the difference between recognition and reward

The value which according to PMBOK (agile principle) is option B

A 입니다. 사람마다 요구하는 보상이 다릅니다

Given the "misunderstandings" and the overtime, those who work the hardest must be rewarded.

Has anyone seen the Office episode where Michael and Jim put beans on printouts of faces of all the people at work to select someone for promotion? Well, it ended up being chaotic. I choose A.

it believe its C because it says team bonding

The project manager should **arrange a luncheon for all team members and include team-building sessions** (Option B). This approach not only provides a well-deserved break for the team but also fosters team spirit and camaraderie. Team-building sessions can help address misunderstandings and improve communication among team members. Moreover, it ensures that the reward benefits all team members equally and is used in a manner that contributes to the overall team morale and project success. It's important to remember that rewards should be used in a way that acknowledges the team's hard work and promotes a positive and collaborative work environment.

I think B is the most appropriate answer here. anyone?

Why not option B. The team has misunderstanding. Doesn't the team require more of team building sessions for them to collaborate and work together peacefully?

C. Draft a points system to allocate a portion of the money for each resource. This approach involves a fair and systematic allocation of the award based on each team member's contribution and effort to address the scheduling delays and meet critical milestones. It can help recognize and reward individual and team performance. Options A (asking the team how to spend the reward) may have merit, but they do not directly address the fair and equitable distribution of the award based on contributions

C is correct

Just a comment, does anyone see anytime in any company within a predictive project scope that the team members decide how the bonuses or the awards will be shared within the team? By other side, the question said that the extra hours situation induced into missunderstandings among the team members, it shows that the team doesn´t have a big maturity neither a big team work. Does the company have any need to generate another situation of missunderstanding and discussions within the team??