Exam PMP topic 1 question 216 discussion

B makes more sense for me, thoughts?

This s a problem of engagement: this stakeholder is not enough engaged ...and communications are useless: if this guy is not involved in the project he will not listen to anything. The point is "how to engage this stakeholder?"

I think this is the most effective approach. By identifying and emphasizing nonfinancial benefits (like improved processes, reduced workload, or enhanced collaboration), the project manager can motivate the vendor management head to support the project. The sponsor's influence can also help secure their cooperation.

The project manager should **C. Work with the sponsor on a communications management plan to obtain support from the vendor management head**. This approach ensures that the vendor management head understands the project's importance and how their support is critical to its success. It's important to communicate effectively with all stakeholders, especially those whose support is crucial for the project. This option does not assume any benefits for the vendor management team, which aligns with the information that they will not derive any benefits from the project. It's a direct and proactive approach to gain the required support.

Terms of reference (TOR) define the purpose and structures of a project, committee, meeting, negotiation, or any similar collection of people who have agreed to work together to accomplish a shared goal. I believe Head of Vendor mgmt should be part of TOR committee as there is a dependency

C. Work with the sponsor on a communications management plan to obtain support from the vendor management head

C. Work with the sponsor on a communications management plan to obtain support from the vendor management head

Q. A project manager is preparing to start a new project in which the team members are distributed geographically across different countries. The project manager is using the communications management plan to engage the team members and find a communication method that suits everyone. A project manager is preparing to start a new project in which the team members are distributed geographically across different countries. The project manager is using the communications management plan to engage the team members and find a communication method that suits everyone. How should the project manager continually evaluate the effectiveness of the virtual team's engagement? a. Establish periodic face-to-face meetings and address the communication topic. b. Conduct individual meetings to create a trusting environment with team members. c. Hold meetings in accordance with the team members' preferences and availability d. Collect feedback from the team to discuss alternatives to enhance the communication.

C. The project manager needs to engage the vendor management head and obtain their support for the project. The vendor management head may not have a direct benefit from the project, so it is crucial to communicate the project's value and gain their commitment. Developing a communications management plan in collaboration with the sponsor will help the project manager effectively communicate the purpose, objectives, and benefits of the project to the vendor management head. The plan can outline the key messages, channels, and frequency of communication to ensure that the vendor management head receives the necessary information and is aware of the project's importance.

The best course of action for the project manager in this scenario would be option C, which is to work with the sponsor on a communications management plan to obtain support from the vendor management head. In this scenario, it is essential to communicate effectively with the vendor management head and gain their support for the project. The project manager should work with the sponsor to identify the key communication messages and channels that will be most effective in engaging the vendor management team.

Option B may not be the best solution either. Reviewing the terms of reference of the steering committee to include the vendor management head may be difficult, time-consuming, and may not guarantee support from the vendor management head. Option C is a good course of action because communication is key to obtaining support from the vendor management head. Working with the sponsor on a communications management plan can help the project manager identify the best way to communicate the project's benefits to the vendor management head. This plan should include the project's objectives, benefits, and how the vendor management head's support is critical to achieving these objectives.

The project manager should work with the sponsor to identify nonfinancial benefits that the vendor management team can derive from the project. Once these benefits are identified, the project manager can leverage them to obtain support from the vendor management head. This approach can help to build a collaborative relationship between the project team and the vendor management team, which can be beneficial in the long run.

would go with C

I will repeat what arnibert said: "If I was the vendor management head I would not waste my time sitting on a steering committee of a project I have no benefits from."

Tough question! I do not agree with (B). If I was the vendor management head I would not waste my time sitting on a steering committee of a project I have no benefits from. I am convinced that this needs to be highlighted to my sponsor to find a solution. Reviseing the communication plan can be the first step...

I go for B too. The question/problem doesn't seem to have any relevance with regard to communication