Exam PMP topic 1 question 17 discussion

In conclusion, the correct answer, D, suggests that by regularly capturing and reviewing project work and related costs before the situation occurs, the project manager could have identified and addressed discrepancies or issues early, ultimately preventing the delayed invoice and increased costs during project handover. All other answers refer to after the problem occurs this is the only solution that addresses before a problem which is what the question asked.

In my opinion to avoid a situation its important that every reported against a project be reviewed periodically and discrepancies sorted with the vendors immediately to avoid delay and scope creep

A seems like a better answer than D; can someone educate me?

A. It suggests notifying all vendors about deadline and due dates.

D. Captured and reviewed all of the project work and related costs regularly

The issue is not about monitoring, even if the project manager had effectively monitored and evaluated regularly, submitting an invoice when they are about to make the final closing submission would make all efforts futile. Hence ensuring that vendors are aware of deadlines and nonpayment penalties, does help prevent this.

No brainer A. The issue is the later report of invoice. Don't forget the theme of the question

D is correct

Even if the PM would have been reviewing all project work and related costs, it is critical to relay invoicing and non payment deadlines. Then subsequent invoices can be disputed if necessary. Monitory cost and invoices is important, but there is no recourse for late invoices.

D my vote.. where review freaquently

D. Captured and reviewed all of the project work and related costs regularly

VOTED D

Voted A

d correct

D is correct

The main issue here is a defect in monotoring process activities. Along the project life cycle, the project manager and team have to continually perform M&C activities on cost, schedule, quality, resource, risks and scope. The scenario discribes a predictive approach with a one time deliverable at the end of the project so constant feedback from customer isn't possible. In such an approach, it's key to monitor the above contstraints regularly through out the different phases. As such continously analysing the impact on and balancing constraints in case a modification is done or a change controle process is innitiated and completed due to variances observed due to monotoring that where beyond acceptable levels.

I think B is the answer as even if the project manager reviews the work and costs regularly, the delayed invoice could still be submitted. I think this question deals with the fact that the handover was delayed and if during closing the project manager picked up on the delayed invoice, then he could have addressed it then.