Exam PMP topic 1 question 327 discussion

The spikes didn't help so letting them decide may take a while. I would go for a multi voting event. Keep it fair but realize this has already taken multiple spikes

CD wrong B: if you are conflicting with your teammate , hong long will you need to have an final decision> A/ not the best but usable

Correct answer is B. Even in a multivoting selection, should be determined by 'Team'.

Explanation: PMBOK 7th edition emphasizes collaborative decision-making and team empowerment. Since there is a conflict regarding how to implement a feature, the best approach is to use a structured decision-making technique, such as multivoting, to allow all team members to express their opinions and collectively reach a decision. Agile teams rely on self-organization, and decisions should be made collectively rather than imposed by a project sponsor (D) or forcing endless spike events (C). Option B (allowing the team to decide on their own) lacks structure and could prolong the conflict. Thus, organizing a multivoting event ensures a democratic and effective decision-making process.

The whole team appears to mean that there are multiple teams. There is no task in this world that can make your entire team understand. You can't make them understand that by voting either.

Allow the team to decide on their own which option should be implemented.

B. Spike is intended to perform investigation, experimentation, or prototyping. From the findings, team would be able to review the best option in order to proceed to the next step.

Option B is the right answer

A. El scrum master debe facilitar la reunión pero al final el equipo tomará la decisión.

B. Allow the team to decide on their own which option should be implemented.

B. Allow the team to decide on their own which option should be implemented.

A. Organize a multivoting event to achieve consensus of the whole team. Organizing a multivoting event can be an effective way to achieve consensus within the team. It allows team members to prioritize and vote on the options they believe are the best solutions to the conflict. This collaborative decision-making process can help the team reach a collective agreement and resolve the conflict. It's important to involve the entire team in the decision-making process to ensure that their perspectives are considered. Since a few spikes were already completed with no decision.

A simple majority vote discounts the concerns of the minority’s dissenting view. It rides roughshod over the entire consensus process. Failing to allow the minority view a full discussion and consideration simply means you are imposing the majority view on all. At the same time, an unbending dissenting minority does not hold veto power over the majority view. To do so voids the interest of the majority. Attaining consensus is hard work. Consensus cannot be attained by forced mandate. This is from projectmanager.com B.

Spikes created so let the team implement their ideas.

The team must be self-organized.

why not C?

A spike refers to a time-boxed research activity that helps teams make better decisions & deliver better products. The spike will help the team decide on their own, thus making the better decision as a team.