ExamTopics Logo
Mail Us[email protected]
Menu
Splunk Discussions
exam questions

Exam SPLK-1004 All Questions

View all questions & answers for the SPLK-1004 exam
Go to Exam

Exam SPLK-1004 topic 1 question 58 discussion

Actual exam question from Splunk's SPLK-1004
Question #: 58
Topic #: 1
[All SPLK-1004 Questions]

Which of the following is valid syntax for the split function?

  • A. | eval split phoneNumber by “-“ as areaCode
  • B. | eval areaCodes - split(phoneNumber, “-“)
  • C. | eval phoneNumber split(“-“, 3, areaCodes)
  • D. | eval split(phoneNumber, “-“, areaCodes)
Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B 🗳️
by Derag at April 19, 2024, 10:19 a.m.

Comments

Chosen Answer:
This is a voting comment (?). It is better to Upvote an existing comment if you don't have anything to add.
Switch to a voting comment New
Submit Cancel
teeec
3 months, 4 weeks ago
Selected Answer: B
| eval areaCodes = split(phoneNumber, "-")
upvoted 1 times
...
c1c8784
4 months ago
Selected Answer: B
B. Is the only correct answer, but needs the '-' in "areaCodes - split(phoneNumber, "-")" to be changed to "areaCodes = split(phoneNumber, "-")" As a50b9c8 suggests.
upvoted 1 times
...
a50b9c8
6 months ago
Selected Answer: B
The answer is B but replace - to = to become ( |evan area=split( x , delim)
upvoted 1 times
...
Derag
1 year ago
No, the correct answer is B. This syntax splits the phoneNumber field using the "-" delimiter and creates a new field areaCodes with the split values.
upvoted 2 times
...
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.

Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one. So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.

SaveCancel
exam
Someone Bought Contributor Access for:
SY0-701
London, 1 minute ago