exam questions

Exam SPLK-1003 All Questions

View all questions & answers for the SPLK-1003 exam

Exam SPLK-1003 topic 1 question 77 discussion

Actual exam question from Splunk's SPLK-1003
Question #: 77
Topic #: 1
[All SPLK-1003 Questions]

Which of the following is a benefit of distributed search?

  • A. Peers run search in sequence.
  • B. Peers run search in parallel.
  • C. Resilience from indexer failure.
  • D. Resilience from search head failure.
Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B 🗳️

Comments

Chosen Answer:
This is a voting comment (?). It is better to Upvote an existing comment if you don't have anything to add.
Switch to a voting comment New
jgab
Highly Voted 3 years, 6 months ago
Correct answer is B
upvoted 14 times
ucsdmiami2020
2 years, 7 months ago
Using Splunk docs URL reference https://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/Splunk/8.2.2/DistSearch/Whatisdistributedsearch Parallel reduce search processing If you struggle with extremely large high-cardinality searches, you might be able to apply parallel reduce processing to them to help them complete faster. You must have a distributed search environment to use parallel reduce search processing.
upvoted 1 times
...
...
adamsca
Most Recent 10 months, 2 weeks ago
Selected Answer: B
B is correct
upvoted 1 times
...
kolaturka
1 year, 1 month ago
B. Peers run search in parallel. Distributed search allows a search to be split across multiple indexers and searched in parallel, significantly reducing search time. Additionally, distributed search provides resilience from search head failure, as the search can be restarted from another search head in the cluster.
upvoted 2 times
...
toney_mu
1 year, 3 months ago
Option B is correct, if there were option to select more than 1 then B and C
upvoted 1 times
...
mngesha
1 year, 3 months ago
in my humble opinion B & C would be the right answers yet if only one answer is deemed correct I would prioritize B.
upvoted 2 times
...
splunkuser03
1 year, 4 months ago
B & D
upvoted 1 times
...
Mando22
1 year, 7 months ago
Correct Answer: B
upvoted 1 times
...
emlch
1 year, 8 months ago
B and C may be correct.
upvoted 3 times
emlch
1 year, 8 months ago
But C isn't since doesnt provide indexer resilience
upvoted 1 times
toney_mu
1 year, 3 months ago
When indexer goes down remaining indexers handle all indexing
upvoted 1 times
...
...
...
splunkkid
1 year, 10 months ago
Selected Answer: B
B - Distributed search reduce search processing by running in parallel to indexers
upvoted 1 times
...
denominator
1 year, 11 months ago
Selected Answer: B
i agree with B
upvoted 1 times
denominator
1 year, 11 months ago
Who cares if a search head goes down, only negative is it takes longer to complete your search.
upvoted 1 times
...
...
tomod1
2 years ago
Selected Answer: D
Distributed search provides horizontal scaling, so that a single Splunk Enterprise deployment can search and index arbitrarily large amounts of data. Distributed search is also useful for correlating data across data silos. https://docs.splunk.com/Splexicon:Distributedsearch
upvoted 1 times
...
BlueRoselia
2 years, 2 months ago
Answer B system admin "distributed Search" Users log on to the search head and run reports–The search head dispatches searches to the peers–Peers run searches in parallel and return their portion of results–The search head consolidates the individual results and prepares reports
upvoted 1 times
...
Salman23
2 years, 7 months ago
B is correct. as per document Sys Admin documentation page 190. C and D are incorrect because the question does not mention about clusters. A is not correct, I've never heard about search in sequence on peers.
upvoted 2 times
...
Hudda
2 years, 10 months ago
Friends, could you please confirm this answer?
upvoted 1 times
...
PaulT
2 years, 11 months ago
I think B and C are correct. According to SysAdmin pdf in Module 10: Distributed Search "when an indexer goes down: – The offline indexer does not participate in searches; – The remaining indexers handle all indexing and searches" => the very definition of "C. Resilience from indexer failure."
upvoted 3 times
lilsem
2 years, 8 months ago
But other indexers won't have the data, that would be otherwise in the indexer that went down. Indeed, in the indexer, even if one indexer would go down, other indexers (if it was properly configurated) would have the same copies of data.
upvoted 1 times
lilsem
2 years, 8 months ago
in the indexer cluster*
upvoted 1 times
...
...
...
gsplunker
3 years, 3 months ago
I would go with B and D
upvoted 1 times
gsplunker
3 years, 3 months ago
Sorry B
upvoted 1 times
...
...
TeeCeeP
3 years, 4 months ago
think its c
upvoted 1 times
mybox1
3 years, 4 months ago
B is correct, C would be correct if question was about indexers cluster. In this case is just about standalone indexers.
upvoted 2 times
PaulT
2 years, 11 months ago
If B is correct, how do "standalone indexers" "run searches in parallel"?
upvoted 2 times
AngusBlack
2 years, 10 months ago
Because when you search the data you are searching for could be on one or more indexers. So if half your forwarders send to indexer A and half to indexer B, when you run a search across a sourcetype it would run in parallel across multiple indexers
upvoted 2 times
...
...
...
...
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.

Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one. So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.

SaveCancel
Loading ...