exam questions

Exam GMAT Section 3 Verbal Ability All Questions

View all questions & answers for the GMAT Section 3 Verbal Ability exam

Exam GMAT Section 3 Verbal Ability topic 2 question 133 discussion

Actual exam question from Test Prep's GMAT Section 3 Verbal Ability
Question #: 133
Topic #: 2
[All GMAT Section 3 Verbal Ability Questions]

At many colleges today, regulations have been imposed that forbid the use in speech or print of language that "offends" or "insults" the members of any group, especially women and racial, ethnic, and religious minorities. Although these regulations are defended in the name of "democracy," they restrict freedom of speech and the press in a way that opposes the true spirit of democracy.
The argument above attempts to prove its case primarily by

  • A. impugning the credentials of an opponent
  • B. providing examples that support a theoretical principle
  • C. taking advantage of inconsistencies in the definition of "democracy"
  • D. revealing a contradiction in an opposing point of view
  • E. appealing to the patriotic feelings of its audience
Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D 🗳️

Comments

Chosen Answer:
This is a voting comment (?). It is better to Upvote an existing comment if you don't have anything to add.
Switch to a voting comment New
Currently there are no comments in this discussion, be the first to comment!
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.

Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one. So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.

SaveCancel
Loading ...
exam
Someone Bought Contributor Access for:
SY0-701
London, 1 minute ago