Exam GMAT Section 3 Verbal Ability topic 2 question 328 discussion

Actual exam question from Test Prep's GMAT Section 3 Verbal Ability

Question #: 328
Topic #: 2

[All GMAT Section 3 Verbal Ability Questions]

For a local government to outlaw all strikes by its workers is a costly mistake, because all its labor disputes must then be settled by binding arbitration, without any negotiated public-sector labor settlements guiding the arbitrators. Strikes should be outlawed only for categories of public-sector workers for whose services no acceptable substitute exists.
The statements above best support which of the following conclusions?

A. Where public-service workers are permitted to strike, contract negotiations with those workers are typically settled without a strike.
B. Where strikes by all categories of pubic-sector workers are outlawed, no acceptable substitutes for the services provided by any of those workers are available.
C. Binding arbitration tends to be more advantageous for public-service workers where it is the only available means of settling labor disputes with such workers.
D. Most categories of public-sector workers have no counterparts in the private sector.
E. A strike by workers in a local government is unlikely to be settled without help from an arbitrator.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C 🗳️

by [deleted] at March 9, 2025, 5:56 p.m.

Comments

Submit Cancel

Currently there are no comments in this discussion, be the first to comment!