Suggested Answer:A🗳️
The author first identifies Meyersons critique of the CLS claim that formalism requires objectivism, which matches the first part of choice A.. The rest of the paragraph investigates Meyersons position, using the shoplifting game as an example. The author raises a possible CLS objection, but counters with Meyersons likely reply to it. In doing so, the author is investigating the plausibility of Meyersons critique, and so the rest of A. matches up as well.
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.
Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one.
So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.
Comments