exam questions

Exam LSAT Section 2 Reading Comprehension All Questions

View all questions & answers for the LSAT Section 2 Reading Comprehension exam

Exam LSAT Section 2 Reading Comprehension topic 1 question 158 discussion

Actual exam question from Test Prep's LSAT Section 2 Reading Comprehension
Question #: 158
Topic #: 1
[All LSAT Section 2 Reading Comprehension Questions]

By the year 2030, the Earth's population is expected to increase to 10 billion; ideally, all would enjoy standards of living equivalent to those of present-day industrial democracies. However, if 10 billion people consume critical natural resources such as copper, nickel, and petroleum at the current per capita rates of industrialized countries, and if new resources are not discovered or substitutes developed, such an ideal would last a decade or less. Moreover, projections based on the current rate of waste production in many industrialized countries suggest that 10 billion people would generate enough solid waste every year to bury a large city and its surrounding suburbs 100 meters deep.
These estimates are not meant to predict a grim future. Instead they emphasize the incentives for recycling, conservation, and a switch to alternative materials.
They also suggest that the traditional model of industrial activity, in which individual manufacturing processes take in raw materials and generate products to be sold plus waste to be disposed of, should be transformed into a more integrated model: an industrial ecosystem. In such a system the consumption of energy and materials is optimized, wastes and pollution are minimized, and the effluents of one processwhether they are spent catalysts from petroleum refining or discarded plastic containers from consumer productsserve as the raw material for another process.
Materials in an ideal industrial ecosystem would not be depleted any more than are materials in a biological ecosystem, in which plants synthesize nutrients that feed herbivores, some of which in turn feed a chain of carnivores whose waste products and remains eventually feed further generations of plants. A chunk of steel could potentially show up one year in a tin can, the next year in an automobile, and 10 years later in the skeleton of a building. Some manufacturers are already making use of "designed offal" in the manufacture of metals and some plastics: tailoring the production of waste from a manufacturing process so that the waste can be fed directly back into that process or a related one. Such recycling still requires the expenditure of energy and the unavoidable generation of some wastes and harmful by-products, but at much lower levels than are typical today.
The ideal industrial ecosystem, in which there is an economically viable role for every product of a manufacturing process, will not be attained soon; current technology is often inadequate to the task. However, if industrialized nations embrace major and minor changes in their current industrial practices and developing nations bypass older, less ecologically sound technologies, it should be possible to develop a more closed industrial ecosystem that would be more sustainable than current industrial practices, especially in the face of decreasing supplies of raw materials and-increasing problems of waste and pollution
The author mentions all of the following as advantages of replacing current industrial practices with an industrial ecosystem approach EXCEPT:

  • A. The amount of waste produced by industrial processes would be reduced.
  • B. The amount of harmful by-products produced by industrial processes would be reduced.
  • C. The use of alternative sources of energy to provide power for industrial processes would be increased.
  • D. The consumption of raw materials used in industrial processes would be optimized.
  • E. Better use would be made of the waste produced by industrial processes.
Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C 🗳️
The author mentions" is the kind of categorical language that clearly signals a Detail Question. And where are the advantages of the iie to be found? In ¶ 2, of course, where it’s described. And the list, of aspects of the proposal is practically tailor-made for an "all of the following EXCEPT." Your approach ought to be to reread that list, and try matching up each of its phrases to the choices. Well review them in order. The list begins with optimizing energy consumption and materials—the latter is D. Minimizing waste is next, that’s A. Minimizing pollution — or "harmful by-products" as B. has it—is next. Finally, the reuse of one process’s "effluents" (don’t panic, it’s just a fancy way of saying "waste") is echoed in E. . Interestingly, that list begins at line 23 with the issue of energy, but notice how correct choice C. distorts it. C. s reference to alternative energy sources sounds pretty progressive and environment-friendly. Also, it might seem to echo the reference to "alternative materials". But alternative energy sources never appear in the text, are never attached to the iie concept.

Comments

Chosen Answer:
This is a voting comment (?). It is better to Upvote an existing comment if you don't have anything to add.
Switch to a voting comment New
Currently there are no comments in this discussion, be the first to comment!
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.

Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one. So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.

SaveCancel
Loading ...