exam questions

Exam LSAT Section 2 Reading Comprehension All Questions

View all questions & answers for the LSAT Section 2 Reading Comprehension exam

Exam LSAT Section 2 Reading Comprehension topic 1 question 205 discussion

Actual exam question from Test Prep's LSAT Section 2 Reading Comprehension
Question #: 205
Topic #: 1
[All LSAT Section 2 Reading Comprehension Questions]

Most scientists who study the physiological effects of alcoholic beverages have assumed that wine, like beer or distilled spirits, is a drink whose only active ingredient is alcohol. Because of this assumption, these scientists have rarely investigated the effects of wine as distinct from other forms of alcoholic beverages.
Nevertheless, unlike other alcoholic beverages, wine has for centuries been thought to have healthful effects that these scientistswho not only make no distinction among wine, beer, and distilled spirits but also study only the excessive or abusive intake of these beverageshave obscured.
Recently, a small group of researchers has questioned this assumption and investigated the effects of moderate wine consumption. While alcohol has been shown conclusively to have negative physiological effectsfor example, alcohol strongly affects the body's processing of lipids (fats and other substances including cholesterol), causing dangerous increases in the levels of these substances in the blood, increases that are a large contributing factor in the development of premature heart diseasethe researchers found that absorption of alcohol into the bloodstream occurs much more slowly when subjects drink wine than when they drink distilled spirits. More remarkably, it was discovered that deaths due to premature heart disease in the populations of several European countries decreased dramatically as the incidence of moderate wine consumption increased. One preliminary study linked this effect to red wine, but subsequent research has shown identical results whether the wine was white or red. What could explain such apparently healthful effects?
For one thing, the studies show increased activity of a natural clot-breaking compound used by doctors to restore blood flow through blocked vessels in victims of heart disease. In addition, the studies of wine drinkers indicate increased levels of certain compounds that may help to prevent damage from high lipid levels. And although the link between lipid processing and premature heart disease is one of the most important discoveries in modern medicine, in the past 20 years researchers have found several additional important contributing factors. We now know that endothelial cell reactivity (which affects the thickness of the innermost walls of blood vessels) and platelet adhesiveness (which influences the degree to which platelets cause blood to clot) are each linked to the development of premature heart disease. Studies show that wine appears to have ameliorating effects on both of these factors: it decreases the thickness of the innermost walls of blood vessels, and it reduces platelet adhesiveness. One study demonstrated a decrease in platelet adhesiveness among individuals who drank large amounts of grape juice. This finding may be the first step in confirming speculation that the potentially healthful effects of moderate wine intake may derive from the concentration of certain natural compounds found in grapes and not present in other alcoholic beverages.
Based on the passage, the author's attitude toward the scientists discussed in the first paragraph can most accurately be described as

  • A. highly enthusiastic
  • B. tacitly approving
  • C. grudgingly accepting
  • D. overtly critical
  • E. clearly outraged
Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D 🗳️
As weve seen, the scientists of 1 have been remiss in assuming that just because wine contains alcohol, which is generally harmful, there must be nothing to the centuries-old idea that wine can have healthful effects. That assumption is what the passage’s heroes, the "small group of researchers" introduced in 1st paragraph, have been questioning, so the scientists are the villains, and "overtly critical" sums them up. Remember, "overtly" and "overly" are two different things.
"Overtly" means that the author states his criticism flat out, which he does.

Comments

Chosen Answer:
This is a voting comment (?). It is better to Upvote an existing comment if you don't have anything to add.
Switch to a voting comment New
Currently there are no comments in this discussion, be the first to comment!
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.

Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one. So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.

SaveCancel
Loading ...