exam questions

Exam MCAT Section 1 Verbal Reasoning All Questions

View all questions & answers for the MCAT Section 1 Verbal Reasoning exam

Exam MCAT Section 1 Verbal Reasoning topic 1 question 55 discussion

Actual exam question from Test Prep's MCAT Section 1 Verbal Reasoning
Question #: 55
Topic #: 1
[All MCAT Section 1 Verbal Reasoning Questions]

Studies of photosynthesis began in the late eighteenth century. One scientist found that green plants produce a substance (later shown to be oxygen) that supports the flame of a candle in a closed container. Several years later it was discovered that a plant must be exposed to light in order to replenish this flame- sustaining "substance." Soon another discovery showed that the oxygen is formed at the expense of another gas, carbon dioxide.
In 1804, de Saussure conducted experiments revealing that equal volumes of carbon dioxide and oxygen are exchanged between a plant and the air surrounding it. De Saussure determined that the weight gained by a plant grown in a pot equals the sum of the weights of carbon derived from absorbed carbon dioxide and water absorbed through plant roots. Using this information, de Saussure was able to postulate that in photosynthesis carbon dioxide and water combine using energy in the form of light to produce carbohydrates, water, and free oxygen. Much later, in 1845, scientists increased understanding of concepts of chemical energy led them to perceive that, through photosynthesis, light energy is transformed and stored as chemical energy.
In the twentieth century, studies comparing photosynthesis in green plants and in certain sulfur bacteria yielded important information about the photosynthetic process. Because water is both a reactant and a product in the central reaction, it had long been assumed that the oxygen released by photosynthesis comes from splitting the carbon dioxide molecule. In the 1930s, however, this popular view was decisively altered by the studies of C. B. Van Niel. Van Niel studied sulfur bacteria, which use hydrogen sulfide for photosynthesis in the same way that green plants use water, and produce sulfur instead of oxygen. Van Niel saw that the use of carbon dioxide to form carbohydrates was similar in the two types of organisms. He reasoned that the oxygen produced by green plants must derive from water rather than carbon dioxide, as previously assumed in the same way that the sulfur produced by the bacteria derives from hydrogen sulfide. Van Niels finding was important because the earlier belief had been that oxygen was split off from carbon dioxide, and that carbon then combined with water to form carbohydrates. The new postulate was that, with green plants, hydrogen is removed from water and then combines with carbon dioxide to form the carbohydrates needed by the organism.
Later, Van Niels assertions were strongly backed by scientists who used water marked with a radioactive isotope of oxygen in order to follow photosynthetic reactions. When the photosynthetically-produced free oxygen was analyzed, the isotope was found to be present.
Which of the following can be inferred about the scientists discussed in the passage?

  • A. They relied on abstract reasoning in the absence of physical data.
  • B. They never came to understand the role of light in photosynthesis.
  • C. Each contributed to our understanding of the production of oxygen by plants.
  • D. They tended to undervalue previous scientific findings.
Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C 🗳️
This is an inference question regarding the scientists discussed in the passage. The unnamed eighteenth century scientists in paragraph 1 laid the groundwork for understanding the role of oxygen; de Saussure postulated the production of free oxygen during photosynthesis; Van Niels conclusions revised our understanding of the actual source of oxygen in the photosynthetic reaction, and his findings were subsequently verified by other scientists. The generalization in choice (C) is thus accurate. Physical data are referred to throughout the passage, in all four paragraphs, so choice (A) is contradicted. Nothing suggests choice (B); the second paragraph makes it clear that de Saussure hypothesized that light energized the photosynthetic process, and then that scientists in 1845 added to our understanding by realizing that light energy is converted to chemical energy. Similarly, choice (D) is implicitly contradicted: all the scientists mentioned apparently benefited from and built on the work of previous scientists.

Comments

Chosen Answer:
This is a voting comment (?). It is better to Upvote an existing comment if you don't have anything to add.
Switch to a voting comment New
Currently there are no comments in this discussion, be the first to comment!
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.

Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one. So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.

SaveCancel
Loading ...