exam questions

Exam MCAT Section 1 Verbal Reasoning All Questions

View all questions & answers for the MCAT Section 1 Verbal Reasoning exam

Exam MCAT Section 1 Verbal Reasoning topic 1 question 63 discussion

Actual exam question from Test Prep's MCAT Section 1 Verbal Reasoning
Question #: 63
Topic #: 1
[All MCAT Section 1 Verbal Reasoning Questions]

Although nihilism is commonly defined as a form of extremist political thought, the term has a broader meaning. Nihilism is in fact a complex intellectual stance with venerable roots in the history of ideas, which forms the theoretical basis for many positive assertions of modern thought. Its essence is the systematic negation of all perceptual orders and assumptions. A complete view must account for the influence of two historical crosscurrents: philosophical skepticism about the ultimacy of any truth, and the mystical quest for that same pure truth. These are united by their categorical rejection of the "known".
The outstanding representative of the former current, David Hume (17111776), maintained that external reality is unknowable, since sense impressions are actually part of the contents of the mind. Their presumed correspondence to external "things" cannot be verified, since it can be checked only by other sense impressions. Hume further asserts that all abstract conceptions turn out, on examination, to be generalizations from sense impressions. He concludes that even such an apparently objective phenomenon as a cause-and-effect relationship between events may be no more than a subjective fabrication of the observer.
Stanley Rosen notes: "Hume terminates in skepticism because he finds nothing within the subject but individual impressions and ideas."
For mystics of every faith, the "experience of nothingness" is the goal of spiritual practice. Buddhist meditation techniques involve the systematic negation of all spiritual and intellectual constructs to make way for the apprehension of pure truth. St. John of the Cross similarly rejected every physical and mental symbolization of God as illusory. St. John’s spiritual legacy is, as Michael Novak puts it, "the constant return to inner solitude, an unbroken awareness of the emptiness at the heart of consciousness. It is a harsh refusal to allow idols to be placed in the sanctuary. It requires also a scorching gaze upon all the bureaucracies, institutions, manipulators, and hucksters who employ technology and its supposed realities to bewitch and bedazzle the psyche".
Novaks interpretation points to the way these philosophical and mystical traditions prepared the ground for the political nihilism of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. The rejection of existing social institutions and their claims to authority is in the most basic sense made possible by Humean skepticism. The political nihilism of the Russian intelligentsia combined this radical skepticism with a near mystical faith in the power of a new beginning. Hence, their desire to destroy becomes a revolutionary affirmation; in the words of Stanley Rosen, "Nihilism is an attempt to overcome or repudiate the past on behalf of an unknown and unknowable, yet hoped-for, future." This fusion of skepticism and mystical re-creation can be traced in contemporary thought, for example as an element in the counterculture of the 1960s.
Which of the following is a necessary assumption underlying Humes conclusion that external reality is unknowable, as discussed in the passage?

  • A. Nothing outside the mind exists.
  • B. The contents of the mind consist exclusively of sense impressions.
  • C. Causality is a subjective projection of the mind.
  • D. Sense impressions provide our only information about external reality.
Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D 🗳️
This question centers on Humes conclusion in Paragraph 2 that external reality is unknowable. Hume argued that there is no way to verify whether our sense impressions actually correspond to external reality because all we have to check one of our sense impressions is other sense impressions. He assumed, therefore, that we have no source of information about external reality other than sense impressions Choice D.
Hume never concluded, at least as far as we know, that "nothing outside the mind exists"; he just said that we couldn’t know what was outside the mind. This rules out Choice A. Choice B twists Humes belief that sense impressions are actually part of the contents of the mind; Hume didnt say that sense impressions were all that we have upstairs. Choice C is a distortion of Humes conclusion that causality may be a subjective projection of the mind.

Comments

Chosen Answer:
This is a voting comment (?). It is better to Upvote an existing comment if you don't have anything to add.
Switch to a voting comment New
Currently there are no comments in this discussion, be the first to comment!
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.

Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one. So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.

SaveCancel
Loading ...