exam questions

Exam 5V0-21.20 All Questions

View all questions & answers for the 5V0-21.20 exam

Exam 5V0-21.20 topic 1 question 32 discussion

Actual exam question from VMware's 5V0-21.20
Question #: 32
Topic #: 1
[All 5V0-21.20 Questions]

An administrator arrives at work and begins their morning checks on a four node, all-flash vSAN Cluster. They notice the vSAN datastore reached 99% capacity due to a single node failure.
How can the administrator provide temporary relief?

  • A. change FTT=1 with RAID-5 (Erasure coding) to FTT=1 with RAID-1 (Mirroring)
  • B. change FTT=1 with RAID-1 (Mirroring) to FTT=1 with RAID-5 (Erasure coding)
  • C. change FTT=1 with RAID-1 (Mirroring) to FTT=0 No data redundancy
  • D. change FTT=1 with RAID-5 (Erasure coding) to FTT=0 No data redundancy
Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B 🗳️

Comments

Chosen Answer:
This is a voting comment (?). It is better to Upvote an existing comment if you don't have anything to add.
Switch to a voting comment New
Rabbit117
Highly Voted 4 years, 3 months ago
I think C as this will free up the capacity used by the mirror copies of the components. B is incorrect as you will require a min of 4 hosts for Raid 5. Changing from Raid 1 to Raid 5 will require additional space during the rebuild process.
upvoted 7 times
Parziwolle
4 years, 2 months ago
But there are 4-nodes - or?: "...begins their morning checks on a four node, all-flash vSAN Cluster."
upvoted 1 times
majkelaliroza
4 years, 1 month ago
Yeap, there are four nodes and one of them crashed, so still we have 3 nodes and RAID5 will only be able to exist on 3 nodes with Force Provisioning ( but there is nothing about it in any of the answers)
upvoted 1 times
...
...
...
jsi928
Most Recent 1 year, 11 months ago
C. Since it did not say it was now out of compliance (RAID 5 requires a min of 4 hosts) and now there are only 3. Plus RAID 1 FTT1 only requires 3 and Rec 4 so it would still be in compliance and takes up 2X the space, thus the 99% capacity.
upvoted 1 times
...
Lazylinux
3 years, 5 months ago
I would go with C, since no compliance was violated hence tells me it is Mirror FTT1 existing and loss of one host only impacted capacity and not compliance , how ever C is NOT supported by VMware but doable Important: Use of a VM storage policy with FTT = 0 (No Data Redundancy) is not supported and can cause data loss if there is a failure or if the VM becomes unresponsive. https://docs.vmware.com/en/VMware-Cloud-on-AWS/services/com.vmware.vsphere.vmc-aws-manage-data-center-vms.doc/GUID-EDBB551B-51B0-421B-9C44-6ECB66ED660B.html
upvoted 2 times
...
[Removed]
4 years, 1 month ago
I think C as this will free up the capacity used by the mirror copies of the components.
upvoted 2 times
...
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.

Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one. So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.

SaveCancel
Loading ...