Exam SY0-501 topic 1 question 201 discussion

Peer review is a process used for checking the work performed by one's equals (peers) to ensure it meets specific criteria. Peer review is used in working groups for many professional occupations because it is thought that peers can identify each other's errors quickly and easily, speeding up the time that it takes for mistakes to be identified and corrected. In software development, peer review is sometimes used in code development where a team of coders will have a meeting and go through code line by line (even read it aloud possibly) to look for errors

IM confused the analyst reports that the lifecycle DOES NOT contain a phase in which team members evaluate and provide critical feedback of another developer's code. if Peer review could be a team of coders then are they not team members. The question said does not contain in which team members evaluate and provide critical feedback of another developer's code. that sounds like peer review, or unless this question is worded very wrong SMH

Human analysis of software source code is described as a code review or as a manual peer review. It is important that the code be reviewed by developers (peers) other than the original coders to try to identify oversights, mistaken assumptions, or a lack of knowledge or experience. It is important to establish a collaborative environment in which reviews can take place effectively.

Keyword "peer"...all scientific publications are "peer reviewed" so science "garbage" is NOT published...software need same "peer review" process cause we all know garbageIN=garbageOUT.

Keyword "peer"...all scientific publications are "peer reviewed" so science "garbage" is published...software need same "peer review" process cause we all know garbageIN=garbageOUT.

Can someone explain why is D please?